hickmorais

nada haver SR SMITH, tem que pesquisar e pronto, as regras estão ai pra isso, tudo tem regra.

nao vi nenhuma ignorancia e preconceito nessa reportagem
pre workouts sao uma merda com ou sem essa reportagem

voce ainda nao perceberam que quem fala bem disso sao revistas e sites que tem propaganda disso? voces tem ideia de quanto uma revista lucra com uma pagina inteira de anuncio? voces acham que vao publicar um artigo que fala a verdade sobre isso? ah claro a revista ta lucrando com isso entao pra que ela revelaria
e o bodybuilding.com VENDE esse produtos, entao voces acham que vao publicar a verdade sobre isso? ah vá mr obvious

o que acontece hoje em dia é uma lavagem cerebral pela industria multimilionaria de suplementos, alguem ja viu comercial das marcas famosas nutrex, bsn, muscletech etc? ridiculo aquilo, e claro a maioria aqui ja ta acostumado a viver nessa realidade e vai me apedrejar falando algo do tipo: "mas voce nunca usou, voce nao sabe como é, eu ja tomei e é bom mimimimi"

dificil aceitar um conhecimento quando voce ja ta cego pela coisa toda, agora quero ver quem defende isso ler artigos de escritores freelancer, que tem a total liberdade de falar a verdade ja que nao estao presos pela propaganda, nisso que todos deveriam acreditar e nao nessa besteirada toda que revistas e sites que lucram com isso, quero ver algum escritor freelancer falando que pre workouts funcionam e sao bons, mas nao vai acontecer pois eles falam a verdade

e sinceramente nao vi nenhuma ignorancia ou preconceito na reportagem, neguinho viaja falando isso. Estimulantes viciam sim, podem ter fortes colaterais, danos a saude e levar a morte

ninguem pensa como eu que suplementos sao na maioria só marketing? ninguem precisa de suplemento, resultados vao ser os mesmos com ou sem, suplementos sao desnecessarios e 100% descartaveis. ninguem percebeu que é so lucro em cima da ingenuidade das pessoas?


cresçam por favor

usei, nao senti nada, dim dim jogado fora, pra mim NO não vale c x b

edit: saRcopenia, desculpe pelo erro

não vou traduzir, mas quem quiser sinta-se a vontade.

'Bad' Cholesterol Not as Bad as People Think, Study Shows

ScienceDaily (May 5, 2011) — The so-called "bad cholesterol" -- low-density lipoprotein commonly called LDL -- may not be so bad after all, shows a Texas A&M University study that casts new light on the cholesterol debate, particularly among adults who exercise.

Steve Riechman, a researcher in the Department of Health and Kinesiology, says the study reveals that LDL is not the evil Darth Vader of health it has been made out to be in recent years and that new attitudes need to be adopted in regards to the substance. His work, with help from colleagues from the University of Pittsburgh, Kent State University, the Johns Hopkins Weight Management Center and the Northern Ontario School of Medicine, is published in the Journal of Gerontology.

Riechman and colleagues examined 52 adults from ages to 60 to 69 who were in generally good health but not physically active, and none of them were participating in a training program. The study showed that after fairly vigorous workouts, participants who had gained the most muscle mass also had the highest levels of LDL (bad) cholesterol, "a very unexpected result and one that surprised us.

"It shows that you do need a certain amount of LDL to gain more muscle mass. There's no doubt you need both -- the LDL and the HDL -- and the truth is, it (cholesterol) is all good. You simply can't remove all the 'bad' cholesterol from your body without serious problems occurring.

Cholesterol is found in all humans and is a type of fat around the body. A person's total cholesterol level comprises LDL (low-density lipoprotein) and HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol.

LDL is almost always referred to as the "bad" cholesterol because it tends to build up in the walls of arteries, causing a slowing of the blood flow which often leads to heart disease and heart attacks.

HDL, usually called the "good cholesterol," often helps remove cholesterol from arteries.

"But here is where people tend to get things wrong," Riechman says.

"LDL serves a very useful purpose. It acts as a warning sign that something is wrong and it signals the body to these warning signs. It does its job the way it is supposed to.

"People often say, 'I want to get rid of all my bad (LDL) cholesterol,' but the fact is, if you did so, you would die," the Texas A&M professor adds. "Everyone needs a certain amount of both LDL and HDL in their bodies. We need to change this idea of LDL always being the evil thing -- we all need it, and we need it to do its job."

According to the American Heart Association, about 36 million American adults have high cholesterol levels.

"Our tissues need cholesterol, and LDL delivers it," he notes. "HDL, the good cholesterol, cleans up after the repair is done. And the more LDL you have in your blood, the better you are able to build muscle during resistance training."

Riechman says the study could be helpful in looking at a condition called sarcopenia, which is muscle loss due to aging. Previous studies show muscle is usually lost at a rate of 5 percent per decade after the age of 40, a huge concern since muscle mass is the major determinant of physical strength. After the age of 60, the prevalence of moderate to severe sarcopenia is found in about 65 percent of all men and about 30 percent of all women, and it accounts for more than $18 billion of health care costs in the United States.

"The bottom line is that LDL -- the bad cholesterol -- serves as a reminder that something is wrong and we need to find out what it is," Riechman says.

"It gives us warning signs. Is smoking the problem, is it diet, is it lack of exercise that a person's cholesterol is too high? It plays a very useful role, does the job it was intended to do, and we need to back off by always calling it 'bad' cholesterol because it is not totally bad."

fonte:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110505142730.htm